Smith v. South Carolina Department of Juvenile Justice et al
| Erica Smith |
| South Carolina Department of Juvenile Justice, Clemson University d/b/a Camp Ghigau, Youth Learning Institute d/b/a Camp Ghigau, Ken Banks in his official capacity as Assistant Director of Camp Ghigau and David Austin Blackwell |
| 9:2021cv03851 |
| November 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Molly H Cherry |
| Sherri A Lydon |
| Prison:Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Erica Smith.(dgar)
|
|
Filing 2
Summons Issued as to David Austin Blackwell, Clemson University d/b/a Camp Ghigau, Ken Banks in his official capacity as Assistant Director of Camp Ghigau, South Carolina Department of Juvenile Justice, Youth Learning Institute d/b/a Camp Ghigau. Service due by 3/2/2022 (dgar) Modified on 12/2/2021 to update filing date(dgar).
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against David Austin Blackwell, Clemson University d/b/a Camp Ghigau, Ken Banks in his official capacity as Assistant Director of Camp Ghigau, South Carolina Department of Juvenile Justice, Youth Learning Institute d/b/a Camp Ghigau ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ASCDC-10203584.), filed by Erica Smith. Service due by 2/22/2022 (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents)(dgar)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
