Singleton v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
| Sterling L Singleton |
| South Carolina Department of Corrections, Bryan P. Stirling, Dennis Patterson, Willie Davis, Terry Wallace, Whittington, Willie Ocean, Michael Pressly, Edward Gadsden, Brennan, Ms. Labradore, William Gill, Shanon Dean, Anthony Berry, Tishiro Inabnit, Sophia Paquette, Terry Marshall, Dr. Kennard Dubose, Shawn Stover and Myers |
| 9:2022cv00940 |
| March 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Molly H Cherry |
| Joseph Dawson |
| Prison:Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Sterling L Singleton. (Attachments: #1 Financial Certificate, #2 Envelope)Motions referred to Molly H Cherry.(apsn)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Anthony Berry, Brennan, Willie Davis, Shanon Dean, Dr. Kennard Dubose, Edward Gadsden, William Gill, Tishiro Inabnit, Terry Marshall, Ms. Labradore, Myers, Willie Ocean, Sophia Paquette, Dennis Patterson, Michael Pressly, South Carolina Department of Corrections, Bryan P. Stirling, Shawn Stover, Terry Wallace, Whittington, filed by Sterling L Singleton. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Supporting Documents 1-21, #3 Envelope)(apsn)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
