Bouhadja v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
| Adem Bouhadja |
| United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Caitlin Wegrzyn |
| 9:2022cv01558 |
| May 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Richard M Gergel |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Adem Bouhadja. Ur Mendoza Jaddou served on 5/27/2022, answer due 7/26/2022; United States Citizenship and Immigration Services served on 5/27/2022, answer due 7/26/2022; Caitlin Wegrzyn served on 5/27/2022, answer due 7/26/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit mail receipts)(Derrick, Michael) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Adem Bouhadja.(sshe, ) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Ur Mendoza Jaddou, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Caitlin Wegrzyn. U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (sshe, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ur Mendoza Jaddou, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Caitlin Wegrzyn ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ASCDC-10493894.), filed by Adem Bouhadja. Service due by 8/15/2022(sshe, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
