Porter v. Phelps
| Marcus Porter and Marcus M. Porter |
| Warden Phelps |
| 9:2022cv01862 |
| June 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Molly H Cherry |
| Donald C Coggins |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Marcus Porter placed in U.S. Mail from Charleston Clerks Office to Marcus Porter 97902-020 Federal Correctional Complex P.O.Box 1000 Petersburg, VA 23804. (apsn) |
| Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Marcus Porter. It is RECOMMENDED that the Petition in this action be TRANSFERRED, to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. Objections to R&R due by 8/16/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Molly H Cherry on 08/02/2022. (apsn, ) |
| Judge Magistrate Judge Molly H Cherry no longer assigned to case per #4 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Molly H Cherry on 08/02/2022. (apsn) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Marcus Porter. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Envelope)(apsn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
