Atain Specialty Insurance Company v. Patlan Flooring, Inc. et al
| Atain Specialty Insurance Company |
| Patlan Flooring, Inc., Profloors, LLC and Kenneth W. French |
| 9:2022cv02551 |
| August 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| David C Norton |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION of Dismissal Without Prejudice by Atain Specialty Insurance Company. (Silverman, William) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by Profloors, LLC.(Cleveland, David) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Atain Specialty Insurance Company. Profloors, LLC served on 8/8/2022, answer due 8/29/2022. (Silverman, William) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Kenneth W. French, Patlan Flooring, Inc., Profloors, LLC. (hcor, ) |
| Filing 4 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Atain Specialty Insurance Company.(hcor, ) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Atain Specialty Insurance Company. (hcor, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kenneth W. French, Patlan Flooring, Inc., Profloors, LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ASCDC-10622944.), filed by Atain Specialty Insurance Company. Service due by 10/31/2022 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Underlying Action, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(hcor, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
