Mansell v. Lewis
| Kyrkland Mansell and Krykland Mansell |
| Hobart Lewis |
| 9:2022cv03519 |
| October 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Molly H Cherry |
| Bruce Howe Hendricks |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #5 Order, a Complaint for Violation of Civil Rights (Prisoner Complaint) form placed in U.S. Mail from Charleston Clerks Office to Kyrkland Mansell 238188-0721 Greenville County Detention Center 20 Mcgee Street Greenville, SC 29601. (apsn) |
Filing 5
ORDER: You are ordered to always keep the Clerk of Court advised in writing (Post Office Box 835, Charleston, South Carolina 29402) if your address changes for any reason, so as to assure that orders or other matters that specify deadlines for you to meet will be received by you. Motions granted: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) filed by Kyrkland Mansell. Signed by Magistrate Judge Molly H Cherry on 12/08/2022. (apsn)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Kyrkland Mansell. (Attachments: #1 Financial Certificate, #2 Envelope)Motions referred to Molly H Cherry.(apsn) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Hobart Lewis, filed by Kyrkland Mansell. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(apsn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
