Mallory et al v. Terminal Investment Corporation
| Douglas R. Mallory |
| Terminal Investment Corporation and Greg Marco |
| 9:2022cv04538 |
| December 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| David C Norton |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
First MOTION to Amend/Correct by Douglas R. Mallory. Response to Motion due by 2/17/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support, #2 Exhibit 1 - Amended Complaint, #3 Certificate of Service)No proposed order.(Bowen, John)
|
|
Filing 12
NOTICE of Hearing on Motion #8 MOTION to Remand to Court of Common Pleas for Jasper County : Motion Hearing set for 3/20/2023 11:00 AM in Hon. Sol Blatt, Jr., Courtroom, J. Waties Waring Judicial Cntr, 83 Meeting St, Charleston before Honorable David C Norton. (eric, )
|
|
Filing 11
REPLY to Response to Motion re #8 MOTION to Remand to Court of Common Pleas for Jasper County Response filed by Douglas R. Mallory. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service, #2 Exhibit 1 - Amended Complaint, #3 Exhibit 2 - Emails, #4 Exhibit 3 - EEOC)(Bowen, John)
|
|
Filing 10
RESPONSE in Opposition re #8 MOTION to Remand to Court of Common Pleas for Jasper County Response filed by Greg Marco, Terminal Investment Corporation.Reply to Response to Motion due by 1/30/2023 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Gignilliat, William)
|
|
Filing 9
ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Greg Marco, Terminal Investment Corporation. (Gignilliat, William)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION to Remand to Court of Common Pleas for Jasper County by Douglas R. Mallory. Response to Motion due by 1/23/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support Motion to Remand, #2 Exhibit Memo in Support, #3 LR 26.01 Answers)No proposed order.(Bowen, John)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE and Acknowledgment of receipt of Notice of Removal by Clerk of Court for Jasper County. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents)(Gignilliat, William)
|
|
Filing 6
TEXT ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff shall have until 1/12/2023 to file a response to defendant's notice of removal and to file 26.01 interrogatories. Signed by Honorable David C Norton on 12/27/2022.(eric, )
|
|
Filing 5
LETTER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER Terminal Investment Corporation answer due 1/16/2023; Douglas R. Mallory answer due 1/16/2023. (Gignilliat, William)
|
|
Filing 4
Consent MOTION for Extension of Time by Douglas R. Mallory. Response to Motion due by 1/4/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.(Bowen, John)
|
|
Filing 3
Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Greg Marco, Terminal Investment Corporation.(hcor, )
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Jasper County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2022CP2700544. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ASCDC-10851665), filed by Greg Marco, Terminal Investment Corporation. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents)(hcor, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
