Tyler v. Coe et al
Larry James Tyler and Larry James Tyler, |
Waddell Coe and James Hudson |
9:2023cv00270 |
January 20, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Molly H Cherry |
Mary Geiger Lewis |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #6 NEF for Summons Issued, #5 Order 1983, placed in U.S. Mail from Charleston Clerks Office to Larry James Tyler 27980 Darlington County Detention Center 2349 Rogers Rd Darlington, SC 29532 (apsn) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Waddell Coe, James Hudson. Service due by 5/30/2023. (apsn) |
Filing 5 ORDER authorizing service of process and collection of filing fee. Plaintiff has incurred a debt to the U.S.A. in the amount of $350.00. Plaintiff is also directed to notify the clerk in writing of any change of address., Motions granted: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) filed by Larry James Tyler, # 354459, Larry James Tyler. Signed by Magistrate Judge Molly H Cherry on 02/27/2023. (apsn) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Larry James Tyler. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)Motions referred to Molly H Cherry.(apsn) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Waddell Coe, James Hudson, filed by Larry James Tyler. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(apsn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.