Reaves v. Dollar Treet Stores, Inc et al
| Misha L. Reaves |
| Dollar Treet Stores, Inc, John Doe and John Doe 2 |
| 9:2023cv04199 |
| August 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| David C Norton |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 10/10/2023, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 11/13/2023, Rule 26 Report due by 11/13/2023, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 11/16/2023, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 1/18/2024, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 2/20/2024, Discovery due by 6/10/2024, Motions in Limine must be filed at least three weeks prior to jury selection, Motions due by 7/12/2024, Jury Selection Deadline 8/1/2024, Mediation Due by 7/31/2024. Signed by Honorable David C Norton on 09/07/2023. (hcor, ) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint by Dollar Treet Stores, Inc.(Blount, William) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Dollar Treet Stores, Inc.(hcor, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Jasper County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2023CP2700336. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ASCDC-11279012), filed by Dollar Treet Stores, Inc. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents)(hcor, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
