Pearson v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Amanda Pearson
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party: Social Security Administrative Record and US Attorney - Social Security Noticing
Case Number: 9:2023cv05168
Filed: October 16, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: Molly H Cherry
Referring Judge: Donald C Coggins
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 14, 2023 Filing 11 Additional Attachments to Main Document #10 Answer/Electronic Certified Administrative Record,,. First attachment description: Part 21 of 29 . (Attachments: #1 Part 22 of 29, #2 Part 23 of 29, #3 Part 24 of 29, #4 Part 25 of 29, #5 Part 26 of 29, #6 Part 27 of 29, #7 Part 28 of 29, #8 Part 29 of 29)(Leach, David)
December 14, 2023 Filing 10 ANSWER/ELECTRONIC CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD by Commissioner of Social Security Administration.Plaintiffs Brief due by 1/16/2024. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Attachments: #1 Part 2 of 29, #2 Part 3 of 29, #3 Part 4 of 29, #4 Part 5 of 29, #5 Part 6 of 29, #6 Part 7 of 29, #7 Part 8 of 29, #8 Part 9 of 29, #9 Part 10 of 29, #10 Part 11 of 29, #11 Part 12 of 29, #12 Part 13 of 29, #13 Part 14 of 29, #14 Part 15 of 29, #15 Part 16 of 29, #16 Part 17 of 29, #17 Part 18 of 29, #18 Part 19 of 29, #19 Part 20 of 29)(Leach, David)
October 19, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Molly H Cherry. Signed by Honorable Donald C Coggins, Jr on 10/19/2023. (tsim, )
October 18, 2023 Filing 8 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Amanda Pearson.. (Cummings, William)
October 18, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Molly H Cherry on 10/18/2023. (tsim, )
October 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 TEXT ORDER: Directing the parties' attention to the Court's Standing Order on All 42 U.S.C. 405(g) Social Security Disability Appeals Assigned to Judge Donald C. Coggins, Jr., located on the District Court's website. Within 30 days of the date of this Text Order, Plaintiff's counsel is directed to file either a (1) signed and completed Notice, Consent, and Reference of Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form, or (2) status report informing the Court that Plaintiff does not consent to disposition of this action by Magistrate Judge. Entered at the direction of the Honorable Donald C Coggins, Jr on 10/17/2023. (tsim, )
October 16, 2023 Filing 4 Notice: Social Security Case Service. Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security, the Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system notifying the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration Office of the General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the case. No summonses shall issue. Set Answer Deadline - Social Security Complaint: Answer due from Commissioner of Social Security Administration on 12/15/2023. (tsim, )
October 16, 2023 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Amanda Pearson. Response to Motion due by 10/30/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order. Motions referred to Molly H Cherry. (tsim, )
October 16, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Administration filed by Amanda Pearson. Clerk's Note: See 28:636(b)(1)(C)(4)(c)(1) and Local Rule 83.VII.03 regarding Consent to Proceed before Magistrate Judge in Social Security cases. Consent to Proceed before Magistrate Judge forms are available on the Court's website. (tsim, ) Modified on 10/17/2023 to correct filing date. (tsim, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pearson v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amanda Pearson
Represented By: William Blake Cummings
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Represented By: David Leach
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administrative Record
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: US Attorney - Social Security Noticing
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?