Bing et al v. Global Integrity Logistics, LLC et al
| Tammy Sharan Bing and Ted Bing |
| Global Integrity Logistics, LLC and Michael Leroy Perkins |
| 9:2023cv05839 |
| November 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| David C Norton |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Tammy Sharan Bing, Ted Bing , SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tammy Sharan Bing, Ted Bing. Global Integrity Logistics, LLC served on 12/16/2023, answer due 1/8/2024. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Service on Defendant Global)(Whetstone, Charles) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tammy Sharan Bing, Ted Bing. Michael Leroy Perkins served on 11/29/2023, answer due 12/20/2023. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Whetstone, Charles) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Global Integrity Logistics, LLC, Michael Leroy Perkins. (hcor, ) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Tammy Sharan Bing, Ted Bing.(hcor, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Global Integrity Logistics, LLC, Michael Leroy Perkins ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ASCDC-11426889.), filed by Tammy Sharan Bing, Ted Bing. Service due by 2/12/2024(hcor, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
