Capers v. Hernandez et al
| Paul Capers |
| Christina Hernandez, Jason Loy, Hampton County Sheriff's Office and Vital Core Health Strategies, LLC |
| 9:2023cv06888 |
| December 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Mary Gordon Baker |
| Bruce Howe Hendricks |
| Prison:Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #6 Order, Terminate Motions, placed in U.S. Mail from Charleston Clerk's Office to Paul Capers 0001475654 Charleston County Detention Center 3841 Leeds Ave. North Charleston, SC 294045. (dgar) |
Filing 6
ORDER: The Clerk shall file Plaintiff's complaint from Case No. -6888 in Case No. -6821, and the Court will construe the two complaints as a single pleading for purposes of initial review. All future filings should be filed under Case No. -6821. Motion GRANTED: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) filed by Paul Capers. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker on 2/9/2024. (dgar)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Paul Capers. Motions referred to Mary Gordon Baker.(dgar) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Paul Capers. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dgar) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
