Asmussen v. Young et al
Petitioner: David John Asmussen
Respondent: Warden Darin Young and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Case Number: 1:2019cv01024
Filed: November 13, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of South Dakota
Presiding Judge: Charles B Kornmann
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions: Habeas Corpus - General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 16, 2019 Filing 7 Resistance to Order for Dismissal #5 by Petitioner David John Asmussen (KLE)
December 16, 2019 Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of David John Asmussen in Support of #7 Resistance to Order for Dismissal. (KLE)
December 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER. Signed by U.S. District Judge Charles B. Kornmann on 12/02/2019. (KLE) Modified on 12/2/2019 sent to David John Asmussen via USPS (KLE).
November 27, 2019 Filing 4 LETTER Received from David Asmussen to the Clerk of Court. (CLR)
November 27, 2019 Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by David John Asmussen. (CLR)
November 27, 2019 Filing Fee Received from David John Asmussen. Fee Amount: $5.00, Receipt No.: #SDX300003358. (DLC)
November 13, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE TO PETITIONER: The Clerks Office has received your Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. Although a new case has been opened, your case cannot proceed further until you either pay the filing fee OR complete and return the enclosed Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Declaration AND Prisoner Trust Account Report (to be completed by the institution where you are incarcerated.). Copy of docket sheet, motion to proceed IFP, and Prisoner Trust Account form sent to petitioner. Any further documents or correspondence you send to the Clerks Office concerning your case must include the case number. All documents submitted for filing must also contain an original signature. Submitted documents are electronically scanned for filing and they become the official court record. The quality of the official court record is determined by the quality of the original documents received for filing. Writing should only be on one side of the paper and writing must be dark enough for scanning. All documents must be on 8.5 x 11 inch paper. (KLE)
November 13, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28:2254 filed by David John Asmussen. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Ground V.) (KLE)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Asmussen v. Young et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: David John Asmussen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Darin Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?