Triplet et al v. Menard, Inc. et al
| Mary Triplet and Margaret Triplet |
| Menard, Inc. and Barb Myers |
| 1:2021cv01016 |
| July 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of South Dakota |
| Charles B Kornmann |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
ORDER granting #18 Motion to Restrict Exhibit. Signed by U.S. District Judge Charles B. Kornmann on 8/18/21. (SKK)
|
| Filing 18 MOTION to Restrict Exhibit by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Restricted Exhibit 2, #2 Proposed Order) (DLC) |
| Filing 17 AFFIDAVIT of Sarah Baron Houy re #16 Brief, #13 Memorandum Letter . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Petition for Appointment of Guardian and Conservator, #2 Exhibit 2 - Evaluation Report) (Baron Houy, Sarah) (Attachment 2 replaced on 8/18/2021) (SKK). |
| Filing 16 BRIEF by Plaintiffs Margaret Triplet, Mary Triplet re #13 Memorandum Letter (Baron Houy, Sarah) |
| Filing 15 AFFIDAVIT of Paul W. Coppock re #14 Brief . (Attachments: #1 Ex D - Waiver and Consent to Response, #2 Ex E - Order Appointing Gdn and Conservator) (Coppock, Paul) |
| Filing 14 BRIEF by Defendants Menard, Inc., Barb Myers re #13 Memorandum Letter (Coppock, Paul) |
| Filing 13 MEMORANDUM LETTER re: documents filed by the Defendants. Signed by U.S. District Judge Charles B. Kornmann on August 2, 2021. (DLC) |
| Filing 12 RETURN OF SERVICE Executed upon Defendant Menard, Inc. on July 16, 2021 (Baron Houy, Sarah) |
| Filing 11 RETURN OF SERVICE Executed upon Defendant Barb Myers on July 15, 2021 (Baron Houy, Sarah) |
| Filing 10 RETURN OF SERVICE Executed upon Defendant Barb Myers on July 14, 2021 (Baron Houy, Sarah) |
| Filing 9 RETURN OF SERVICE Executed upon Defendant Menard, Inc. on July 12, 2021 (Baron Houy, Sarah) |
| Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT in Support re #5 MOTION to Compel Arbitration MOTION to Stay Proceedings filed by Menard, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Exhibit A - Redacted Employee/Employer Agr, #2 Attachment Exhibit B - Voluntary Separation, #3 Attachment Exhibit C - Charge of Discrimination) (Coppock, Paul) |
| Filing 7 MEMORANDUM in Support re #5 MOTION to Compel Arbitration MOTION to Stay Proceedings filed by Menard, Inc.. (Coppock, Paul) |
| Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT in Support re #5 MOTION to Compel Arbitration MOTION to Stay Proceedings filed by Menard, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Attachment SEALED Exhibit A - Employee/Employer Agr, #2 Attachment Exhibit B - Voluntary Separation, #3 Attachment Exhibit C - Charge of Discrimination) (Coppock, Paul) Modified to seal EX A on 7/29/2021 (DJP). |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Compel Arbitration, MOTION to Stay Proceedings by Menard, Inc.. (Coppock, Paul) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Paul W. Coppock on behalf of Menard, Inc.. (Coppock, Paul) |
| Filing 3 AMENDED COMPLAINT, with Jury Demand . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Notice of Right to Sue) (Baron Houy, Sarah) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. 2 Summons(es), a Rule 73 Memo, and AO 85s for each party delivered to plaintiff's counsel via electronic delivery. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 AO 85)(SKK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand, $402 fee paid, receipt# ASDDC-3582070, in shell case on 7/8/21 filed by Mary Triplet, Margaret Triplet on 7/8/21. (SKK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
