Fonder v. Flemmer et al
Darin John Fonder |
Judge Jon S. Flemmer, Jennifer G. Lurken, Judge Tony Portra, David R. Gienapp, Attorney Robert Anderson and Gilason & Hunter |
1:2021cv01032 |
October 25, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of South Dakota |
Charles B Kornmann |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER granting #8 Motion to Stay. Signed by U.S. District Judge Charles B. Kornmann on 11/29/21. Mailed to plaintiff. (SLW) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Jennifer G. Lurken on behalf of Gilason & Hunter, Jennifer G. Lurken. (Lurken, Jennifer) |
Filing 9 JOINDER by Defendants Gilason & Hunter, Jennifer G. Lurken re #8 MOTION to Stay (Lurken, Jennifer) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Stay by Robert Anderson, Jon S. Flemmer, Tony Portra. (Anderson, Robert) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert B. Anderson on behalf of Robert Anderson, Jon S. Flemmer, Tony Portra. (Anderson, Robert) |
Filing 6 Amended Summons Issued as to Tony Portra. Delivered to Pro Se Plaintiff via US Postal Service. (DLC) |
Filing 5 Summons Reissued as to All Defendants. Sent to Plaintiff via US Postal Service. (DLC) Mailed Summons and seven A085 forms to Plaintiff on 10/28/2021 (DJP). |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF: The Clerks Office has received your Complaint together with the filing fee and completed summons(es). A new case has been opened. Your summmons(es) will be issued. You are responsible for arranging service of the summons(es) and complaint on the defendant(s). Copy of docket sheet sent to plaintiff. Pro Se Litigant Registration Form for Electronic Notice also sent to plaintiff. Any further documents or correspondence you send to the Clerks Office concerning your case must include the case number. All documents submitted for filing must also contain an original signature. Submitted documents are electronically scanned for filing and they become the official court record. The quality of the official court record is determined by the quality of the original documents received for filing. Writing should only be on one side of the paper and writing must be dark enough for scanning. All documents must be on 8.5 x 11 inch paper. A request to electronically file documents in your case must be made through the PACER Service Center at www.pacer.uscourts.gov. The plaintiff must keep the Court informed of the plaintiff's address changes, including changes to primary and secondary email addresses. If the Court is not kept informed and multiple items are returned as undelivered, the plaintiff's case may be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. (SLW) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. 6 Summons(es), a Rule 73 Memo, a copy of Fed.R.Civ.P.4, and AO 85s for each party delivered to plaintiff via mail. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 AO 85)(SLW) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Discovery by Darin John Fonder. (SLW) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand, $402 fee paid, receipt# SDX300003926,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Affidavit of citizenship, #2 Exhibit B1- jurisdictional challenge, #3 Exhibit B2- jurisdictional challenge, #4 Exhibit B3 - jurisdictional challenge, #5 Exhibit C1- Roberts County Complaint, #6 Exhibit C2 - Roberts County Complaint, #7 Cover Letter) (SLW) Modified on 10/26/2021 to restrict access to Exhibit A per Chambers. (CLR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.