Shields v. USA

Petitioner: Justin Shields
Respondent: USA
Case Number: 3:2013cv03005
Filed: February 7, 2013
Court: South Dakota District Court
Office: Central Division Office
County: Buffalo
Presiding Judge: Karen E. Schreier
Referring Judge: John E. Simko
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28:2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 21, 2013 5 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER denying petition for writ of habeas corpus; adopting 3 Report and Recommendation; rejecting 4 Objection to Report and Recommendation. Signed by U.S. District Judge Karen E. Schreier on 3/21/13. (KC)
November 7, 2013 7 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER denying 6 Motion for reconsideration. Signed by U.S. District Judge Karen E. Schreier on 11/7/2013. (KC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shields v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Justin Shields
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Represented By: Kevin Koliner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.