Fuller v. Leidholt
| Matthew P. Fuller |
| Sheriff Mike Leidholt, Hughes County Jail, United States Marshal Service and Minnehaha County Jail |
| 3:2018cv03011 |
| July 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of South Dakota |
| Central Division Office |
| Hughes |
| Roberto A Lange |
| Prisoner Petitions - Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER re filing fee. Signed by U.S. District Judge Roberto A. Lange on 8/24/18. (JLS)
|
| Filing 2 New Case LETTER with enclosed 1983 packet and docket sheet sent by Clerk's Office to Matthew P. Fuller. (SAC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT pursuant to 42:1983 - Prisoner Civil Rights filed by Matthew P. Fuller. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Jana Miner Email, #2 Exhibit 2 - Jody Fuller Email, #3 Exhibit 3 - Mike Leidholt Email, #4 Exhibit 4 - Letter to Stephan Houghtelling, #5 Exhibit 5 - Letter to USM Theilen, #6 Exhibit 6 - Letter to Office of Inspector General, #7 Exhibit 7 - Tarah Bertsch Letter, #8 Exhibit 8 - Complaint filed with the Office of Inspector General, #9 Exhibit 9 - Complaint to BOP Internal Affairs, BOP Office of Professional Responsibility and Office of the Inspector General, #10 Exhibit 10 - Complaint to Office of Inspector General, #11 Postmarked Envelope (7/16/2018)) (SAC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
