Kurtenbach v. City of Winner
| Matthew Kurtenbach |
| City of Winner |
| 3:2019cv03018 |
| October 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of South Dakota |
| Jeffrey L Viken |
| Prisoner Petitions - Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 RESPONSE to #10 Scheduling Request filed by City of Winner. (Deibert, Douglas) |
| Filing 10 SCHEDULING Request. Proposed Schedule due by 1/3/2020. Signed by Chief Judge Jeffrey L. Viken on 12/4/19. (SB) |
| NOTICE of Filing Error: #9 Order for Discovery Report was filed in error and should be disregarded. (SB) |
Filing 9
FILED IN ERROR -- ORDER for Discovery Report and Scheduling Information. Signed by Chief Judge Jeffrey L. Viken on 12/3/19. (SB) Mailed to Kurtenbach on 12/3/2019 (SLW). Modified on 12/4/2019 to note filing error (SB).
|
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by City of Winner. (Deibert, Douglas) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to City of Winner. 1 Summmons, Complaint, and #5 emailed to Pierre Clerk's Office for hand delivery to Pierre USM. (CLR) |
| Filing 6 Service LETTER with enclosed blank summons, USM 285s, samples, AO 85, Rule 73 memo, and doc 5 sent by Clerk's Office to Matthew Kurtenbach. (SLW) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Chief Judge Jeffrey L. Viken on 10/29/19. (SB) Mailed to Kurtenbach and Jail on 10/29/2019 (SLW).
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF: The Clerks Office has received your Civil Rights Complaint together with an Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees and Declaration Under Penalty of Perjury and Prisoner Trust Account Report. A new case has been opened. Copy of docket sheet sent to plaintiff. Any further documents or correspondence you send to the Clerks Office concerning your case must include the case number. All documents submitted for filing must also contain an original signature. Submitted documents are electronically scanned for filing and they become the official court record. The quality of the official court record is determined by the quality of the original documents received for filing. Writing should only be on one side of the paper and writing must be dark enough for scanning. All documents must be on 8.5 x 11 inch paper. (CLR) |
| Filing 3 PRISONER Trust Account Report. (CLR) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Matthew Kurtenbach. (CLR) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT pursuant to 42:1983 - Prisoner Civil Rights with Jury Demand filed by Matthew Kurtenbach. (CLR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kurtenbach v. City of Winner | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: City of Winner | |
| Represented By: | Douglas M. Deibert |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Matthew Kurtenbach | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
