Steffen v. Uplift, Inc.
Plaintiff: Mark David Steffen
Defendant: Uplift, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2022cv03017
Filed: October 26, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of South Dakota
Presiding Judge: Roberto A Lange
Referring Judge: Mark A Moreno
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Uplift, Inc. re #8 Notice, #2 MOTION to Set Aside Default . (Limoges, Anna)
December 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE by Uplift, Inc. of No Opposition. (Limoges, Anna)
November 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Uplift, Inc. re #6 Corporate Disclosure Statement . (Limoges, Anna)
November 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by Uplift, Inc.. (Limoges, Anna)
October 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Uplift, Inc. re #2 MOTION to Set Aside Default . (Limoges, Anna)
October 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT in Support re #2 MOTION to Set Aside Default filed by Uplift, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Affidavit of Robert Mahnke, #2 Attachment Affidavit of Marcella Bralts, #3 Attachment Affidavit of Traci Oberman, #4 Attachment Affidavit of James Stanfield, #5 Attachment Affidavit of Rosa Stanley) (Limoges, Anna)
October 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 BRIEF by Defendant Uplift, Inc. re #2 MOTION to Set Aside Default (Limoges, Anna)
October 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION to Set Aside Default by Uplift, Inc.. (Limoges, Anna)
October 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Uplift, Inc. from Small Claims Court of the Sixth Judicial Circuit, Gregory County, South Dakota, case number 26SMC22-000046. ($402.00 fee paid, receipt# ASDDC-3905548) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certified Mail Return Receipt, #2 Exhibit B - Notice of Small Claims, #3 Exhibit C - Statement of Small Claims, #4 Exhibit D - Affidavit of Military Status, #5 Exhibit E - Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #6 Exhibit F - Order for Default Judgment, #7 Exhibit G - Judgment, #8 Certificate of Service)(JLS)
October 26, 2022 Opinion or Order CLERK'S NOTICE: Fed. R. Civ. P. 73 requires that all parties be notified of the opportunity to consent to have a magistrate judge conduct all proceedings in civil cases. All parties must return the signed AO85 form to the Clerk's Office before the case is reassigned to a magistrate judge. DO NOT electronically file or return the signed form to the District Judge. The AO85 form can be found by clicking here: #National Forms: https://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (JLS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Steffen v. Uplift, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mark David Steffen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Uplift, Inc.
Represented By: Anna Mae Limoges
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?