Agtegra Cooperative v. Over XXI, Inc. et al
| Agtegra Cooperative |
| Over XXI, Inc., Sacramento Energy Resources, L.L.C. and Pico Propane Operating, L.L.C. doing business as Pico Propane and Fuels |
| 3:2023cv03032 |
| November 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of South Dakota |
| Roberto A Lange |
| Mark A Moreno |
| Torts: Personal Property - Other Personal Property Damage |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
RULE 16 SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 11/30/2024. Motions due by 12/15/2024. Signed by Chief Judge Roberto A. Lange on 1/26/24. (SKK) Modified on 1/26/2024 (SKK).
|
| Filing 16 Discovery Report by Agtegra Cooperative.(Theesfeld, Steven) |
| Filing 15 CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by Over XXI, Inc.. (Gray, John) |
| Filing 14 CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by Pico Propane Operating, L.L.C. identifying Corporate Parent Meritum Energy Holdings, LP for Pico Propane Operating, L.L.C.. (Hale, William) |
| Filing 13 CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by Sacramento Energy Resources, L.L.C. identifying Corporate Parent Sacramento Energy Resources, L.L.C. for Sacramento Energy Resources, L.L.C.. (Redd, Ryan) |
| Filing 12 AMENDED ANSWER to Amended Separate Answer of Sacramento Energy Resources, L.L.C. to Amended Complaint by Sacramento Energy Resources, L.L.C.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Sacramento Energy Resources, LLC General Terms and Conditions Liquid Petroleum Gas)(Redd, Ryan) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Ryan W.W. Redd on behalf of Sacramento Energy Resources, L.L.C.. (Redd, Ryan) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER for Discovery Report and Scheduling Information. Signed by Chief Judge Roberto A. Lange on 12/21/23. (SKK)
|
| Filing 9 RETURN OF SERVICE Executed upon Defendant Sacramento Energy Resources, L.L.C. on 11/30/2023 (Theesfeld, Steven) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand Separate Answer of Sacramento Energy Resources, L.L.C. to Amended Complaint by Sacramento Energy Resources, L.L.C.. (Haigh, Mark) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Over XXI, Inc.. (Gray, John) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by William Hale on behalf of Pico Propane Operating, L.L.C.. (Hale, William) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Pico Propane Operating, L.L.C.. (Hale, William) |
| Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE Executed upon Defendant Over XXI, Inc. on 11/13/2023 (Theesfeld, Steven) |
| Filing 3 RETURN OF SERVICE Executed upon Defendant Sacramento Energy Resources, L.L.C. on 11/13/2023 (Theesfeld, Steven) |
| Filing 2 RETURN OF SERVICE Executed upon Defendant Pico Propane Operating, L.L.C. on 11/20/2023 (Theesfeld, Steven) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Over XXI, Inc. from Sixth Judicial Circuit, case number 42CIV23-000020. ($402 fee paid, receipt# ASDDC-4172382) (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents)(SKK) (Main Document 1 replaced on 11/30/2023) (SKK). |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Fed. R. Civ. P. 73 requires that all parties be notified of the opportunity to consent to have a magistrate judge conduct all proceedings in civil cases. All parties must return the signed AO85 form to the Clerk's Office before the case is reassigned to a magistrate judge. DO NOT electronically file or return the signed form to the District Judge. The AO85 form can be found by clicking here: #National Forms: https://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (SKK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
