USA v. Bank Account in the amount of $20,537.42
4:2006cv04016 |
January 20, 2006 |
US District Court for the District of South Dakota |
Southern Division Office |
Lawrence L. Piersol |
Forfeit/Penalty: Other |
Civil Forfeiture of Real Property |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 221 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting government's motion for summary judgment (Docket 171) with respect to Dataport and Turbo ISP bank accounts; denying as moot Jewell's motion for immediate dismissal or court-ordered jury trial (Docket 183) in relation to the Dataport and Turbo ISP accounts. Signed by Chief Judge Karen E. Schreier on 3/24/2009. (KC) |
Filing 214 ORDER denying motion for reconsideration re 208 Letter, 209 Response filed by Timothy Jewell. Signed by Chief Judge Karen E. Schreier on 1/27/2009. (KC) |
Filing 197 ORDER denying 178 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Chief Judge Karen E. Schreier on 1/5/2009. (KC) |
Filing 194 ORDER granting in part and reserving ruling in part 171 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Karen E. Schreier on 12/31/2008. (KC) |
Filing 8 ORDER to Publish Notice of Civil Forfeiture. Signed by Judge Lawrence L. Piersol on 2/1/06. (SKM) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: USA v. Bank Account in the amount of $20,537.42 | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.