Leith v. Thompson et al

Leith v. Thompson et al

Case Number:	4:2006cv04042
Filed:	February 28, 2006
Court:	US District Court for the District of South Dakota
Office:	Southern Division Office
Presiding Judge:	Lawrence L. Piersol
Presiding Judge:	John E. Simko
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 10, 2006	Filing 9 ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge John E. Simko on 3/10/06. (SKM)
March 6, 2006	Filing 5 ORDER. The Court construes Plaintiff's Motion for temporary restraining order as a request for discovery before the lawsuit is pending pursuant to FRCP 27 and as an interrogatory under Rule 33 and as a request for production under Rule 34. Thi s Order shall be served on defendants contemporaneous with the service of the Summons and Complaint. Defendants shall advise the Court and the plaintiff whether a videotape recording of the alleged incident exists. If so, defendants shall produce t he videotape recording to the Court and to the plaintiff for his inspection and copying. A courtesy copy of this Order shall be mailed to Warden Bob Dooley and to the plaintiff. Notwithstanding this Order, Plaintiff remains responsible for establis hsing his in forma pauperis status or paying the filing fee immediately. If Plaintiff does not qualify for in forma pauperis status, then plaintiff must thereafter make arrangements for service of this lawsuit upon the defendants. Signed by Judge John E. Simko on 3/6/06. (DJP)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 10, 2006

Filing 9 ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge John E. Simko on 3/10/06. (SKM)

March 6, 2006

Filing 5 ORDER. The Court construes Plaintiff's Motion for temporary restraining order as a request for discovery before the lawsuit is pending pursuant to FRCP 27 and as an interrogatory under Rule 33 and as a request for production under Rule 34. Thi s Order shall be served on defendants contemporaneous with the service of the Summons and Complaint. Defendants shall advise the Court and the plaintiff whether a videotape recording of the alleged incident exists. If so, defendants shall produce t he videotape recording to the Court and to the plaintiff for his inspection and copying. A courtesy copy of this Order shall be mailed to Warden Bob Dooley and to the plaintiff. Notwithstanding this Order, Plaintiff remains responsible for establis hsing his in forma pauperis status or paying the filing fee immediately. If Plaintiff does not qualify for in forma pauperis status, then plaintiff must thereafter make arrangements for service of this lawsuit upon the defendants. Signed by Judge John E. Simko on 3/6/06. (DJP)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Leith v. Thompson et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?