Jordan v. Longley
Petitioner: Ellis Jordan
Respondent: Archie Longley
Case Number: 4:2008cv04080
Filed: June 12, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of South Dakota
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County: Yankton
Presiding Judge: Veronica L. Duffy
Presiding Judge: Karen E. Schreier
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 20, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER denying as moot 12 Motion for Evidentiary Hearing; adopting 13 Report and Recommendation; denying as moot 15 Objection to Report and Recommendation; and Dismissing Case. Signed by U. S. District Judge Richard H. Battey on October 20, 2008. (JLH)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jordan v. Longley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ellis Jordan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Archie Longley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?