Dalrymple et al v. Dooley et al
| Daniel R. Dalrymple and Leslie W. White, Jr. |
| SCO Kauth, Tammy Doyle, Robert Dooley, SCO Jackson, Sgt. Dykstra, SCO Benac, Jennifer Stanwick, Layne Schryvers, SCO Magorian, Kim Lippencott, Nancy Christenson, Joshua Klimec and Travis Tjeerdsma |
| 4:2012cv04029 |
| February 17, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of South Dakota |
| Southern Division Office |
| Bon Homme |
| Karen E. Schreier |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
159
ORDER granting 120 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying as moot 85 Motion for TRO; denying as moot 85 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying as moot 108 Motion for Protective Order; denying as moot 109 Motion for Protective Order; denyi ng as moot 136 Motion for Leave to ; denying as moot 140 Motion to Compel; denying as moot 141 Motion to Compel; denying as moot 142 Motion to Compel; denying as moot 143 Motion to Compel; denying as moot 144 Motion to Compel; denying as moot 145 Motion to Compel; denying as moot 146 Motion to Compel; denying as moot 147 Motion to Compel; denying as moot 148 Motion to Compel; denying as moot 149 Motion to Compel; denying as moot 150 Motion to Compel; denying as moot 151 Motion to Compel. Signed by Chief Judge Karen E. Schreier on 11/14/2012. (KC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
