Gard v. Dooley et al
Plaintiff: |
Rex Gard |
Defendant: |
Bob Dooley, Susan Jacobs, Muriel Naminga, Andy Gates, Kelly Swanson, Jenifer Benboom, John Trewiellar and Barry Schroeter |
Case Number: |
4:2014cv04023 |
Filed: |
February 13, 2014 |
Court: |
US District Court for the District of South Dakota |
Office: |
Southern Division Office |
County: |
Aurora |
Presiding Judge: |
Lawrence L. Piersol |
Nature of Suit: |
Civil Rights |
Cause of Action: |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Jury Demanded By: |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
August 31, 2017 |
Filing
229
ORDER granting 198 to the extent that the remaining ADA claims are as set forth in this Order; denying 223 Renewed Motion to File Summary Judgment and denying as moot 226 Plaintiff's Objection to Renewed Motion to File Summary Judgment; de nying [205-220] Applications for Writ of Habeas Corpus; appointing John Hinrichs to represent the Plaintiff. Plaintiff shall, through counsel, file a Witness List with the names of each witness he requests be subpoenaed for trial, with good cause shown why that witness should be subpoenaed. A new court trial date will be scheduled by subsequent Order. Signed by U.S. District Judge Lawrence L. Piersol on 8/31/17. (DJP)
|
August 1, 2017 |
Filing
191
ORDER denying 190 Objection to Magistrate Judge Order. Claims against all individuals in their individual capacities are dismissed. Claims against other Department of Corrections Staff, Department of Health Staff, and CMB Food Services Employees, unknown at this time, are dismissed. Signed by U.S. District Judge Lawrence L. Piersol on 8/1/17. (SLW)
|
July 25, 2017 |
Filing
187
ORDER denying defendants' 186 Motion to Amend/Correct Scheduling Deadlines. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Veronica L. Duffy on 07/25/17. (Duffy, Veronica)
|
July 20, 2017 |
Filing
185
ORDER denying 179 Motion to Extend; denying 181 Motion to Compel; denying 182 Motion for Medical Expert. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Veronica L. Duffy on 7/20/2017. (CG)
|
February 28, 2017 |
Filing
178
ORDER denying 173 Motion for Discovery. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Veronica L. Duffy on 2/28/2017. (CG)
|
January 23, 2017 |
Filing
172
ORDER denying 167 Motion to Compel. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Veronica L. Duffy on 1/23/2017. (CG)
|
September 26, 2016 |
Filing
149
ORDER granting 86 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting 134 Report and Recommendation; denying 148 Objection to Report and Recommendation.. Signed by U.S. District Judge Lawrence L. Piersol on 9/26/16. (DJP)
|
December 23, 2015 |
Filing
128
ORDER denying 98 Ex Parte Motion; granting in part and denying in part 99 Motion; denying 100 Motion; denying 101 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; denying 108 Motion for Leave; denying 114 Motion for Sanctions; denying 116 Motion; denying 121 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Veronica L. Duffy on 12/23/2015. (CG)
|
June 29, 2015 |
Filing
97
ORDER denying 96 Motion for Recusal. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Veronica L. Duffy on 6/29/2015. (CG)
|
February 13, 2015 |
Filing
75
ORDER denying 63 Motion to Appoint Counsel; denying 66 Motion to Extend Deadlines; denying 68 Motion to Sever; granting 72 Motion for Protective Order. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Veronica L. Duffy on 2/13/2015. (CG)
|
August 26, 2014 |
Filing
44
ORDER denying as moot 33 Motion for Hearing; granting 34 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying 8 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 14 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Gard must file an amended complaint with the Court on or before September 26, 2014. Signed by U.S. District Judge Lawrence L. Piersol on 8/26/14. (DJP)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?