Loring v. United States of America et al
| Daniel Loring |
| United States of America, U.S. Department of Justice and Executive Office for United States Attorney's General Counsel |
| 4:2018cv04034 |
| April 3, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of South Dakota |
| Southern Division Office |
| Minnehaha |
| Lawrence L. Piersol |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
117
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 111 MOTION for Reconsideration Signed by U.S. District Judge Lawrence L. Piersol on 04/14/2020. cc: mailed to Daniel Loring via USPS (KLE)
|
|
Filing
109
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying as moot 73 Motion for Sanctions; denying 78 Motion to Compel; denying 80 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying 81 Motion ; denying 83 Motion ; denying 95 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law; granting with prejudice 97 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 104 Motion for Entry of Default. Signed by U.S. District Judge Lawrence L. Piersol on 03/17/2020. Mailed to Daniel Loring via USPS (KLE)
|
|
Filing
38
Memorandum Opinion and Order denying 28 Motion ; denying 29 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying 30 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying 14 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part 23 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting in part 23 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by U.S. District Judge Lawrence L. Piersol on 12/18/18. (mailed to Mr. Loring)(JLS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
