Long et al v. South Dakota Department of Transportation
| Shirley Van Voorst, Jane Griffith, Tim Doyle, Michael Taylor, Sara Doyle, Mark Long, Arnie Van Voorst, Karen Taylor and Marilynn Long |
| South Dakota Department of Transportation |
| 4:2018cv04081 |
| July 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of South Dakota |
| Southern Division Office |
| Lincoln |
| Karen E Schreier |
| Real Property: Land Condemnation |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Filing Fee Received from Sara Doyle, Tim Doyle, Jane Griffith, Marilynn Long, Mark Long, Karen Taylor, Michael Taylor, Arnie Van Voorst, Shirley Van Voorst. Fee Amount: $400, Receipt No.: #0869-2824694. (DJP) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to South Dakota Department of Transportation. Two electronic summons, one A085 form and one Rule 73 memo delivered to plaintiff's counsel via electronic delivery. (Attachments: #1 Bergquist Summons, #2 Daugaard Summons, #3 AO85)(DJP) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (DJP) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR JUST COMPENSATION UNDER THE FIFTH AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION filed by Jane Griffith, Karen Taylor, Sara Doyle, Arnie Van Voorst, Tim Doyle, Mark Long, Shirley Van Voorst, Michael Taylor, Marilynn Long in shell case on 7/10/18. (DJP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
