Sanchez v. Tritten et al
| Oscar Cadena Sanchez |
| David Douglas, Leslie Tritten, Jeff Sessions, Kirstjen M. Nielsen and L. Francis Cissna |
| 4:2018cv04092 |
| August 3, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of South Dakota |
| Southern Division Office |
| Minnehaha |
| Karen E Schreier |
| Immigration: Naturalization Application |
| Review of Denial of Naturalization Application |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 JUDGMENT Signed by U.S. District Judge Karen E. Schreier on 9/18/18. (DJP) |
| Filing 7 STIPULATION TO DISMISS by Oscar Cadena Sanchez. (Abdallah, Scott) |
| Filing 6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SERVICE Executed as to #4 Summons Issued as to USA, #1 Complaint Acknowledgement filed by Oscar Cadena Sanchez. (Abdallah, Scott) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Diana J. Ryan on behalf of All Defendants. (Ryan, Diana) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to USA. 5 original summons, 3 true copies of each summons, 21 A085s, and one Rule 73 memo delivered via hand-delivery to law office staff. (JLS) |
| Filing 3 Filing Fee Received from Oscar Cadena Sanchez. Fee Amount: $400, Receipt No.: #SDX400047623. (JLS) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (JLS) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT For Declaratory Judgment of Naturalization Under 8 U.S.C. 1447(B) filed by Oscar Cadena Sanchez. (JLS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
