LaFleur v. Krebs et al
Dr. Terry Lee LaFleur |
Lora Hubbel, Shantel Krebs, Joel Bergan, Frank Fluckiger, Gordon Howie, Dan Lederman, Marilee Roose and Matt Johnson |
4:2018cv04125 |
September 26, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of South Dakota |
Roberto A Lange |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Terry Lee LaFleur. (DJP) |
Filing 9 OPINION AND ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis; denying #6 Motion for Recusal; denying #8 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by U.S. District Judge Roberto A. Lange on 11/02/2018. (LH) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Terry Lee LaFleur. (Attachments: #1 Env postmarked 10/9/18) (DJP) |
Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT in Support re #6 MOTION for Recusal filed by Terry Lee LaFleur. (SLW) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Recusal by Terry Lee LaFleur. (SLW) |
Filing 5 New Case LETTER with enclosed copy of the docket sheet and the pro se litigant application form sent by Clerk's Office to Terry LaFleur. (JLS) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Terry Lee LaFleur. (JLS) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (JLS) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Terry Lee LaFleur. (Attachments: #1 Demand for Jury Trial) (JLS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.