Huls et al v. Meyer et al
| Mark A. Huls, David L. Skoglund, Catherine M. Peterson and Steven E. Peterson |
| David M. Meyer and Nancy R. Meyer |
| 4:2018cv04126 |
| September 27, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of South Dakota |
| Karen E Schreier |
| Contract: Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER granting plaintiff's #3 Motion to Remand and denying plaintiff's motion for attorney fees and sanctions. Signed by U.S. District Judge Karen E. Schreier on 10/25/2018. (SAC)
|
| Filing 15 Motion Hearing held on 10/22/2018 re #3 MOTION to Remand to McCook County Circuit Court For Attorney Fees and Sanctions filed by Steven E. Peterson, David L. Skoglund, Mark A. Huls, Catherine M. Peterson before U.S. District Judge Karen E. Schreier. (Court Reporter: Jill Connelly) (JLS) |
| Filing 14 AFFIDAVIT in Support re #3 MOTION to Remand to McCook County Circuit Court For Attorney Fees and Sanctions filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Michael E. Unke Itemized Attorney Fees) (Unke, Michael) |
| Filing 13 REPLY to Motion Response re #3 MOTION to Remand to McCook County Circuit Court For Attorney Fees and Sanctions filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 David Meyer Financial Plan, #2 David Skoglund Deposition Exhibit 50 Information, #3 Magnum 43, LLC appraisal letter, #4 Windmill Ridge, LLC appraisal letter, #5 Rawhide, LLC appraisal letter, #6 Remington, LLC appraisal letter, #7 David Meyer Balance Sheet, #8 Transcript of complete Motion Hearing September 14, 2018) (Unke, Michael) |
| Filing 12 REPLY to Motion Response re #4 MOTION for Hearing Expedited filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Order After Hearing Held September 14, 2018, #2 Certified Letter September 15, 2017 to Defendants) (Unke, Michael) |
|
Filing 11
SCHEDULING ORDER: Motion Hearing re #3 MOTION to Remand to McCook County Circuit Court set for 10/22/2018 at 01:00 PM in Sioux Falls Courtroom 2* before U.S. District Judge Karen E. Schreier. Signed by U.S. District Judge Karen E. Schreier on 10/16/18. (JLS)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS TO FILE EXPEDITED REPLY. Signed by U.S. District Judge Karen E. Schreier on 10/16/18. (DJP)
|
| Filing 9 RESPONSE to #4 Motion for Hearing filed by All Defendants. (Rahn, Timothy) |
| Filing 8 RESPONSE to Motion re #3 MOTION to Remand to McCook County Circuit Court For Attorney Fees and Sanctions filed by All Defendants. (Rahn, Timothy) |
| Filing 7 Defendants' ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand , COUNTERCLAIM against All Plaintiffs by All Defendants. (Rahn, Timothy) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO FILE AN EXPEDITED RESPONSE. Signed by U.S. District Judge Karen E. Schreier on 10/10/18. (DJP)
|
| Filing 5 MEMORANDUM in Support re #3 MOTION to Remand to McCook County Circuit Court For Attorney Fees and Sanctions, #4 MOTION for Hearing Expedited filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Original Complaint, #2 Answer & Counterclaim, #3 Verified Amended Complaint, #4 Order After Hearing Held September 14, 2018) (Unke, Michael) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Hearing Expedited by Mark A. Huls, Catherine M. Peterson, Steven E. Peterson, David L. Skoglund. (Unke, Michael) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Remand to McCook County Circuit Court For Attorney Fees and Sanctions by Mark A. Huls, Catherine M. Peterson, Steven E. Peterson, David L. Skoglund. (Unke, Michael) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (JLS) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by All Defendants from First Judicial Circuit Court in McCook County, South Dakota, case number 44CIV18-000004. Filed in shell case on 9/27/18. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-Summons, #2 Exhibit 2-Complaint, #3 Exhibit 3-Sheriff's Return of Personal Service, #4 Exhibit 4- Answer and Counterclaim, #5 Exhibit 5-Reply to Counterclaim, #6 Exhibit 6-Certificate of Service, #7 Exhibit 7- Certificate of Service, #8 Exhibit 8- Certificate of Service, #9 Exhibit 9- Motion to Compel, #10 Exhibit 10- Motion to Establish a Scheduling Order and Other Further Relief, #11 Exhibit 11- Affidavit of M. Unke, #12 Exhibit 12- Notice of Motions Hearing, #13 Exhibit 13- Exhibit 1 filed at Motions Hearing, #14 Exhibit 14- Exhibit 1 Volume 2 filed at Motions Hearing, #15 Exhibit 15- Order denied, #16 Exhibit 16- Order, #17 Exhibit 17- Notice of Entry, #18 Exhibit 18- Notice of Deposition of D. Meyer, #19 Exhibit 19- Notice of Deposition of M. Huls, #20 Exhibit 20- Notice of Deposition of S. Peterson, #21 Exhibit 21- Notice of Deposition of D. Skoglund, #22 Exhibit 22- Notice of Deposition of J. Grady, #23 Exhibit 23-Notice of Deposition of K.Blagg, #24 Exhibit 24- Motion to Amend Complaint, #25 Exhibit 25- Brief in Support of Motion to Amend Complaint, #26 Exhibit 26- Notice of Hearing, #27 Exhibit 27- Motion for Trial Date, #28 Exhibit 28- Motion to Find Defendants in Contempt of Court, #29 Exhibit 29- Affidavit of M. Unke, #30 Exhibit 30- Notice of Hearing, #31 Exhibit 31- Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Motion to find Defendants in Contempt of Court, #32 Exhibit 32- Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Plaintiffs motion to amend complaint, #33 Exhibit 33- Affidavit for Attorneys Fees, #34 Exhibit 34- Veryified Amended Complaint, #35 Exhibit 35- Order After Hearing Held September 14,2018, #36 Exhibit 36- Deposition Transcript, #37 Exhibit 37- Lease Agreement)(JLS) |
| Filing Fee Received from David M. Meyer, Nancy R. Meyer. Fee Amount: $400, Receipt No.: #0869-2885309. (JLS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
