Johnson v. Springfield Prison
| Charles Johnson and Charles Ray Johnson |
| Springfield Prison |
| 4:2019cv04002 |
| January 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of South Dakota |
| Roberto A Lange |
| Prisoner Petitions - Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MOTION to Electronically File Documents. Pro se party Charles Ray Johnson will now receive electronic notice of unsealed documents filed in this case, but must wait for a Court ruling regarding e-filing. Refer to the CM/ECF User Manual located on the court website at www.sdd.uscourts.gov for information about accessing documents. (DJP) |
| Filing 5 New Case LETTER with enclosed docket sheet sent by Clerk's Office to Charles R. Johnson. (SAC) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST for Electronic Notice by Charles Johnson. Pro se party Charles Johnson will now receive electronic notice of unsealed documents filed in this case. Refer to the CM/ECF User Manual located on the court website at www.sdd.uscourts.gov for information about accessing documents. (SAC) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Charles Johnson. (SAC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT pursuant to 42:1983 - Prisoner Civil Rights filed by Charles Johnson. (SAC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
