Palmer et al v. 12th Street Auto Care Center
Charles Johnson and Deon Palmer |
12th Street Auto Care Center |
4:2019cv04039 |
February 20, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of South Dakota |
Roberto A Lange |
Karen E Schreier |
Contract: Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Mail sent to Deon Palmer was returned as undeliverable. #6 Order Reassigning Case was returned. (SKK) |
Filing 6 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to U.S. District Judge Roberto A. Lange for all further proceedings. U.S. District Judge Karen E. Schreier no longer assigned to case. Signed by U.S. District Judge Karen E. Schreier on February 21, 2019. (DLC) Copy sent to Deon Palmer on 2/21/2019 (DLC). |
Filing 5 New Case LETTER with enclosed AO 239 and Docket Sheet sent by Clerk's Office to Deon Palmer and Charles Johnson. (DLC) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Electronically File Documents. Pro se party Charles Johnson will now receive electronic notice of unsealed documents filed in this case, but must wait for a Court ruling regarding e-filing. Refer to the CM/ECF User Manual located on the court website at www.sdd.uscourts.gov for information about accessing documents. (DLC) Modified Docket Text on 2/20/2019 (DLC). |
Filing 3 MISCELLANEOUS SUBMISSION by Plaintiff Deon Palmer (DLC) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand, filed by Deon Palmer, Charles Johnson. (DLC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.