Thompson v. Maguire Iron, Inc.
Corissa Thompson |
Maguire Iron, Inc. |
4:2019cv04043 |
February 22, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of South Dakota |
Karen E Schreier |
Civil Rights: Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER for Discovery Report. Signed by U.S. District Judge Karen E. Schreier on 3/26/2019. (SLT) |
Filing 13 CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by Maguire Iron, Inc.. (Raymond, Cheri) |
Filing 12 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Maguire Iron, Inc.. (Raymond, Cheri) |
Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Corissa Thompson. (Pochop, Stephanie) |
NOTICE of Filing Error: #10 Summons Returned Executed was filed in error and should be disregarded. (Pochop, Stephanie) |
Filing 10 (FILED IN ERROR) SUMMONS Returned Executed by Corissa Thompson. Maguire Iron, Inc. served on 3/4/2019, answer due 3/25/2019. (Pochop, Stephanie) Modified on 3/18/2019 (SAC). |
NOTICE of Filing Error: #9 Return of Service Executed was filed in error and should be disregarded. (Pochop, Stephanie) |
Filing 9 (FILED IN ERROR) RETURN OF SERVICE Executed upon Defendant Maguire Iron, Inc. on March 1, 2019 (Pochop, Stephanie) Modified to correct who was served on 3/14/2019 (SLW). Modified on 3/18/2019 (SAC). |
Filing 8 ORDER granting #5 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Steven A. Smith. Signed by U.S. District Judge Karen E. Schreier on 2/27/2019. (SLT) |
Filing 7 ORDER granting #4 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Matthew A. Frank. Signed by U.S. District Judge Karen E. Schreier on 2/27/2019. (SLT) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Maguire Iron, Inc. 1 original summons, 1 A085, and one Rule 73 memo delivered to plaintiff's counsel via electronic delivery. (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued for Maguire Iron, Inc., #2 AO85 Form)(SAC) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Attorney Steven Andrew Smith to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $100 PHV fee; receipt number 0869-2998671) by Corissa Thompson. (Pochop, Stephanie) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Attorney Matthew A. Frank to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $100 PHV fee; receipt number 0869-2998605) by Corissa Thompson. (Pochop, Stephanie) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS(ES) by Corissa Thompson. (Pochop, Stephanie) |
Filing 2 RULE 73 MEMORANDUM. (Attachments: #1 AO85)(SLT) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand, ($400.00 fee paid, receipt# 0869-2996388) filed by Corissa Thompson. (SLT) Modified on 2/22/2019 filed in shell case on 2/22/2019 (SLT). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Thompson v. Maguire Iron, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Corissa Thompson | |
Represented By: | Stephanie E. Pochop |
Represented By: | Matthew A. Frank |
Represented By: | Steven A. Smith |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Maguire Iron, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Cheri S. Raymond |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.