Anderson v. State of South Dakota et al
| Donald Loren Anderson and Donald L. Anderson |
| Dept. of Corrections, State of South Dakota, Christie Noem, Tom Gilchrist, Deb Eilers, John Doe, South Dakota State Pennitentiary, Alexandro Reyes, Darrin Young, Te Archambeau and Kelly Tjeerdsma |
| 4:2019cv04088 |
| May 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of South Dakota |
| Karen E Schreier |
| Prisoner Petitions - Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT pursuant to 42:1983 - Prisoner Civil Rights with Jury Demand filed by Donald Loren Anderson. (Attachments: #1 Attachments) (KLE) Modified on 7/1/2019 (SLT). |
| Filing Fee Received from Donald Loren Anderson. Fee Amount: $400, Receipt No.: #SDX400050216. (Mendoza, Victoria) |
Filing 4
ORDER. Signed by U.S. District Judge Karen E. Schreier on 05/29/2019. (KLE) Modified on 5/29/2019 cc: sent to Donald Loren Anderson with motion for IFP and Prisoner Trust Account Report via USPS (KLE).
|
| Filing 3 SUPPLEMENT by Plaintiff Donald Loren Anderson re #1 Complaint - Prisoner Civil Rights (42:1983). (KLE) |
| Filing 2 New Case LETTER with enclosed Docket Sheet and 1983 Packet sent by Clerk's Office to Donald Loren Anderson. (SLT) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT pursuant to 42:1983 - Prisoner Civil Rights filed by Donald Loren Anderson. (Attachments: #1 Attachment) (SLT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
