El Karmassi v. Bridgestone America et al
| Mohammed El Karmassi |
| Sedgwick and Bridgestone America |
| 4:2019cv04099 |
| June 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of South Dakota |
| Karen E Schreier |
| Torts: Personal Injury - Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 New Case LETTER to Mohammed El Karmassi. (Attachments: #1 Docket Sheet, #2 Rule 4 - Rules of Civil Procedure) (DLC) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Bridgestone America. Summmons(es), AO 85, and Rule 73 Memo delivered to plaintiff's via electronic delivery. (Attachments: #1 Summons for Bridgestone America, #2 AO 85)(DLC) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel and Affidavit in Support by Mohammed El Karmassi. (DLC) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Electronically File Documents. Pro se party Mohammed El Karmassi will now receive electronic notice of unsealed documents filed in this case, but must wait for a Court ruling regarding e-filing. Refer to the CM/ECF User Manual located on the court website at www.sdd.uscourts.gov for information about accessing documents. (DLC) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs by Mohammed El Karmassi. (DLC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand, ($400 fee paid, receipt# SDX400050143) filed by Mohammed El Karmassi. (Attachments: #1 Attachments) (DLC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
