Wubben v. Yankton County, South Dakota et al
Denise Wubben |
Dan Klimisch and Yankton County, South Dakota |
4:2019cv04109 |
June 27, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of South Dakota |
Karen E Schreier |
Civil Rights: Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER for Discovery Report. Signed by U.S. District Judge Karen E. Schreier on 8/19/2019. (CLR) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by All Defendants. (Deinert, Ryland) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond by Dan Klimisch, Yankton County, South Dakota . (Deinert, Ryland) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Ryland L. Deinert on behalf of All Defendants. (Deinert, Ryland) |
Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE as to Denise Wubben served on Yankton County, South Dakota. (Wilka, Thomas) |
Filing 3 RETURN OF SERVICE as to Denise Wubben served on Daniel J. Klimisch. (Wilka, Thomas) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Dan Klimisch, Yankton County, South Dakota. 2 Summmons(es), a Rule 73 Memo, and AO 85s for each party delivered to plaintiff's counsel via hand-delivery to law office staff. (DLC) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand, ($400.00 fee paid, receipt# SDX400050254) filed by Denise Wubben. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - February 25, 2019 Letter to Denise Wubben, #2 Exhibit B - Yankton County Personnel Handbook) (DLC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.