Metabank v. Santa Barbara Tax Products Group, LLC
| Metabank |
| Santa Barbara Tax Products Group, LLC |
| 4:2019cv04140 |
| August 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of South Dakota |
| Lawrence L Piersol |
| Contract: Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER for Discovery Report and Scheduling Information. Signed by U.S. District Judge Lawrence L. Piersol on October 7, 2019. (Attachments: #1 Letter to Counsel)(DLC)
|
| Filing 11 CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by Santa Barbara Tax Products Group, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Santa Barbara Tax Products Group, LLC for Santa Barbara Tax Products Group, LLC. (Crayne, Ryan) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Santa Barbara Tax Products Group, LLC. (Crayne, Ryan) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Jason C. Smith. Signed by U.S. District Judge Lawrence L. Piersol on 9/27/19. (SKK) (Main Document 9 replaced on 9/30/2019) (SKK).
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Michael W. Seitz. Signed by U.S. District Judge Lawrence L. Piersol on 9/27/19. (SKK) (Main Document 8 replaced on 9/30/2019) (SKK).
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Attorney Jason C. Smith to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $100 PHV fee; receipt number 0869-3161907) by Santa Barbara Tax Products Group, LLC. (Crayne, Ryan) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Attorney Michael W. Seitz to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $100 PHV fee; receipt number 0869-3161902) by Santa Barbara Tax Products Group, LLC. (Crayne, Ryan) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond by Santa Barbara Tax Products Group, LLC . (Crayne, Ryan) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Ryan K. Crayne on behalf of Santa Barbara Tax Products Group, LLC. (Crayne, Ryan) |
| Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons / Complaint served on Becky DeGeorge, Authorized Agent on 08/23/2019, filed by Metabank. (Peterson, Mitchell) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Santa Barbara Tax Products Group, LLC. 1 Summmons(es), a Rule 73 Memo, and AO 85s for each party delivered to plaintiff's counsel via electronic delivery. (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued, #2 AO85)(SAC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, ($400 fee paid, receipt# 0869-3130249) filed by Metabank in shell case on 08/12/2019. (SAC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Metabank v. Santa Barbara Tax Products Group, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Metabank | |
| Represented By: | Mitchell A. Peterson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Santa Barbara Tax Products Group, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Ryan K. Crayne |
| Represented By: | Jason C. Smith |
| Represented By: | Michael W. Seitz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
