Garza-Montenegro v. Cox et al
Gerardo Garza-Montenegro |
Warden JW Cox and Director |
4:2019cv04145 |
August 23, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of South Dakota |
Veronica L Duffy |
Lawrence L Piersol |
Prisoner Petitions: Habeas Corpus - General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 REPLY to Motion Response re #10 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by JW Cox, Director. (Druley (USA), Delia) |
Filing 14 REPLY and Objection to #10 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Gerardo Garza-Montenegro. (CLR) |
Filing 13 DECLARATION of Tawana Ingram re #11 Memorandum in Support of Motion, #12 Statement of Material Facts, #10 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Program Statement, #2 Exhibit B - Public Information Inmate Data, #3 Exhibit C - Inmate Discipline Data, #4 Exhibit D - Incident Report, #5 Exhibit E - Inmate Rights at Discipline Hearing, #6 Exhibit F - Notice of Discipline Hearing, #7 Exhibit G - DHO Report) (Druley (USA), Delia) |
Filing 12 STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS re #10 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by JW Cox, Director. (Druley (USA), Delia) |
Filing 11 MEMORANDUM in Support re #10 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by JW Cox, Director. (Druley (USA), Delia) |
Filing 10 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT by JW Cox, Director. (Druley (USA), Delia) |
Filing 9 TEXT ORDER granting #8 Motion to Extend Deadlines. Respondent's response due by 9/26/2019. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Veronica L. Duffy on 9/16/2019. (CG) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Extend Deadlines to Repond to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by JW Cox, Director. (Druley (USA), Delia) |
Filing 7 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT for service of #4 and #5 (DLC) |
Filing Fee Received from Gerardo Garza-Montenegro. Fee Amount: $5.00, Receipt No.: #SDX300003273. (CLR) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Delia M. Druley (USA) on behalf of JW Cox, Director. (Druley (USA), Delia) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Clerk (DLC) |
Filing 4 ORDER directing service upon respondents. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Veronica L. Duffy on 8/23/2019. (CG) |
Filing 3 NOTICE TO PETITIONER: The Clerks Office has received your Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. 2241. Although a new case has been opened, your case cannot proceed further until you either pay the filing fee OR complete and return the enclosed Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Declaration AND Prisoner Trust Account Report (to be completed by the institution where you are incarcerated.) Copy of docket sheet, motion to proceed IFP, and Prisoner Trust Account form sent to petitioner. Any further documents or correspondence you send to the Clerks Office concerning your case must include the case number. All documents submitted for filing must also contain an original signature. Submitted documents are electronically scanned for filing and they become the official court record. The quality of the official court record is determined by the quality of the original documents received for filing. Writing should only be on one side of the paper and writing must be dark enough for scanning. All documents must be on 8.5 x 11 inch paper. (SLT) |
Filing 2 DECLARATION of Gerardo Garza-Montenegro re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2241). (SLT) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28:2241 filed by Gerardo Garza-Montenegro. (SLT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.