Berry v. Fluke et al
Kevin Berry |
Attorney General for the State of South Dakota and Brent Fluke |
4:2019cv04188 |
November 15, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of South Dakota |
Roberto A Lange |
Prisoner Petitions: Habeas Corpus - General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 NOTICE TO PETITIONER: The Clerks Office has received your Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 together with the filing fee. A new case has been opened and a copy of the docket sheet sent to petitioner. Any further documents or correspondence you send to the Clerks Office concerning your case must include the case number. All documents submitted for filing must also contain an original signature. Submitted documents are electronically scanned for filing and they become the official court record. The quality of the official court record is determined by the quality of the original documents received for filing. Writing should only be on one side of the paper and writing must be dark enough for scanning. All documents must be on 8.5 x 11 inch paper. (CLR) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28:2254 ($5.00 fee paid, receipt# SDX400051189) filed by Kevin Berry. (Attachments: #1 Attachments) (CLR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.