Augustine v. Pitchford et al
| 4:2020cv04072 |
| June 4, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of South Dakota |
| Southern Division Office |
| Prisoner Petitions - Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
60
ORDER granting 49 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by U.S. District Judge Karen E. Schreier on 12/28/2021. Mailed to Daniel Augustine via USPS. (VMM)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER denying 45 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by U.S. District Judge Karen E. Schreier on 07/28/2021. Mailed copy to Mr. Daniel Augustine via USPS (VMM)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER Granting in part and denying in part 26 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and Denying as moot 35 Motion for Protective Order. Signed by U.S. District Judge Karen E. Schreier on June 14, 2021. (Sent to Daniel Todd Augustine via US Postal Service) (DLC)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FEES AND 1915A SCREENINGgranting 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by U.S. District Judge Karen E. Schreier on June 4, 2020. (DLC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Augustine v. Pitchford et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
