Johnson v. Erickson et al
| Charles R. Johnson and Charles Ray Johnson |
| Dave Erickson, Damian Weets, John Doe, John McQuistion and Joe Fishbaugher |
| 4:2020cv04168 |
| October 29, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of South Dakota |
| Karen E Schreier |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Gary P. Thimsen on behalf of Dave Erickson, Joe Fishbaugher, John McQuistion, Damian Weets. (Thimsen, Gary) |
| Filing 15 SUPPLEMENT by Plaintiff Charles Ray Johnson. (MSB) |
| Filing 14 SUPPLEMENT by Plaintiff Charles Ray Johnson. (MSB) |
| Filing 13 LETTER Received from Charles Ray Johnson to Judge Schreier. (MSB) |
| Filing 12 Mail sent to Charles Ray Johnson was returned as undeliverable. 5 New Case Letter was returned. (MSB) |
| Filing 11 USPS Certified Mail Receipts by Plaintiff Charles Ray Johnson. (MSB) |
| Filing 10 Summons Issued as to John Doe, Dave Erickson, Joe Fishbaugher, John McQuistion, Damian Weets. 5 Summons(es), a Rule 73 Memo, and AO 85s for each party delivered to plaintiff via electronic delivery. A copy of Fed.R.Civ.P.4 was sent to plaintiff via email. (Attachments: #1 Dave Erickson Summons, #2 John Doe Summons, #3 Joe Fishbaugher Summons, #4 John McQuistion Summons, #5 Damian Weets Summons, #6 AO85)(MSB) |
Filing 9
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by U.S. District Judge Karen E. Schreier on 10/30/2020. (MSB)
|
| Filing 8 SUPPLEMENT by Plaintiff Charles Ray Johnson re #1 Complaint. (MSB) |
| Filing 7 AMENDED DOCUMENT by Charles Ray Johnson. Amendment to #4 Request for Electronic Notice. (MSB) |
| Filing 6 RECEIVED USB Flash Drive containing pictures and video in re #1 Complaint. Located in Sioux Falls Clerk's vault. (MSB) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF: The Clerks Office has received your Complaint together with an Application to Proceed without Prepaying Fees or Costs. A new case has been opened. Copy of docket sheet sent to plaintiff. Any further documents or correspondence you send to the Clerks Office concerning your case must include the case number. All documents submitted for filing must also contain an original signature. Submitted documents are electronically scanned for filing and they become the official court record. The quality of the official court record is determined by the quality of the original documents received for filing. Writing should only be on one side of the paper and writing must be dark enough for scanning. All documents must be on 8.5 x 11 inch paper. The plaintiff must keep the Court informed if the plaintiff's address changes. If the Court is not kept informed and multiple items are returned as undelivered, the plaintiff's case may be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. (MSB) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST for Electronic Notice by Charles R. Johnson. Pro se party Charles R. Johnson will now receive electronic notice of unsealed documents filed in this case. Refer to the CM/ECF User Manual located on the court website at www.sdd.uscourts.gov for information about accessing documents. (MSB) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Charles R. Johnson. (MSB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Charles R. Johnson. (MSB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
