Clemente v. Rapid City Pierre & Eastern Railroad, Inc.
| Rafael Clemente |
| Rapid City Pierre & Eastern Railroad, Inc. |
| 4:2021cv04041 |
| March 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of South Dakota |
| Karen E Schreier |
| Civil Rights: Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 3/1/2022. Motions due by 4/2/2022. Signed by U.S. District Judge Karen E. Schreier on 5/14/21. (SKK)
|
| Filing 11 FORM 52 REPORT of Parties Planning Meeting by Rapid City Pierre & Eastern Railroad, Inc..(Eden, Shane) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER for Discovery Report and Scheduling Information. Signed by U.S. District Judge Karen E. Schreier on 04/16/2021. (SAC)
|
| Filing 9 CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by Rapid City Pierre & Eastern Railroad, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Genesee & Wyoming Inc., Other Affiliate Brookfield Asset Management, Inc. for Rapid City Pierre & Eastern Railroad, Inc.. (Eden, Shane) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Rapid City Pierre & Eastern Railroad, Inc.. (Eden, Shane) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Shane E. Eden on behalf of Rapid City Pierre & Eastern Railroad, Inc.. (Eden, Shane) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #4 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Rolf T. Fiebiger for Rafael Clemente. Signed by U.S. District Judge Karen E. Schreier on 03/25/2021. (SAC)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Daniel Rasmus for Rafael Clemente. Signed by U.S. District Judge Karen E. Schreier on 03/25/2021. (SAC)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Attorney Rolf Fiebiger to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $100 PHV fee; receipt number 0869-3507246) by Rafael Clemente. (Trzynka, Robert) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Attorney Dan Rasmus to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $100 PHV fee; receipt number 0869-3507245) by Rafael Clemente. (Trzynka, Robert) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Rapid City Pierre & Eastern Railroad, Inc. 1 Summons(es), a Rule 73 Memo, and AO 85s for each party delivered to plaintiff's counsel via electronic delivery. (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued, #2 AO 85 form)(SAC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand, $402.00 fee paid, receipt# 0869-3506674, in shell case on 03/24/2021 filed by Rafael Clemente on 03/24/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Notice of Right to Sue) (SAC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Clemente v. Rapid City Pierre & Eastern Railroad, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Rapid City Pierre & Eastern Railroad, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Shane E. Eden |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Rafael Clemente | |
| Represented By: | Daniel Rasmus |
| Represented By: | Rolf T. Fiebiger |
| Represented By: | Robert D. Trzynka |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
