Johnson v. Clark et al
Petitioner: Charles Ray Johnson
Respondent: South Dakota Attorney General, Darrian Young and Doug Clark
Case Number: 4:2021cv04116
Filed: July 1, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of South Dakota
Presiding Judge: Veronica L Duffy
Referring Judge: Karen E Schreier
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions: Habeas Corpus - General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 10, 2021 Filing 12 MISCELLANEOUS SUBMISSION by Petitioner Charles Ray Johnson (SKK)
August 3, 2021 Filing 11 CERTIFICATE of Service by South Dakota Attorney General, Darrian Young (Wenzel, Chelsea)
August 3, 2021 Filing 10 REDACTED DOCUMENT Brief in Support of Respondents' Motion to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by South Dakota Attorney General, Darrian Young. Redacted version of previously filed document #8 Memorandum in Support of Motion,. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Parole File - Redacted, #2 Attachment Judment and Sentence, #3 Attachment Judgment of Conviction - Redacted, #4 Attachment Release to Parole, #5 Attachment Criminal Judgment and Sentence) (Wenzel, Chelsea)
August 2, 2021 Filing 9 TEXT ORDER granting #5 Motion to Substitute Party. Darrian Young terminated. Doug Clark added. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Veronica L. Duffy on 8/2/2021. (KK) Mailed to Charles Johnson on 8/2/2021 (SLW).
August 2, 2021 Filing 8 MEMORANDUM in Support re #7 MOTION to DISMISS Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by South Dakota Attorney General, Darrian Young. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Parole File, #2 Attachment Judgment and Sentence, #3 Attachment Judgment of Conviction, #4 Attachment Release to Parole, #5 Attachment Criminal Judgment and Sentence) (Wenzel, Chelsea)
August 2, 2021 Filing 7 MOTION to DISMISS Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by South Dakota Attorney General, Darrian Young. (Wenzel, Chelsea)
August 2, 2021 Filing 6 MEMORANDUM in Support re #5 MOTION to Substitute Party filed by South Dakota Attorney General, Darrian Young. (Wenzel, Chelsea)
August 2, 2021 Filing 5 MOTION to Substitute Party by South Dakota Attorney General, Darrian Young. (Wenzel, Chelsea)
August 2, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Chelsea J. Wenzel on behalf of South Dakota Attorney General, Darrian Young. (Wenzel, Chelsea)
July 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER directing service upon respondents. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Veronica L. Duffy on 7/6/2021. (CG) Mailed Charles Ray Johnson on 7/6/2021 and emailed 2254 SD State Penitentiary service group per service agreement (DJP)
July 1, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE TO PETITIONER: The Clerks Office has received your Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. Although a new case has been opened, your case cannot proceed further until you either pay the filing fee OR complete and return the enclosed Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Declaration AND Prisoner Trust Account Report (to be completed by the institution where you are incarcerated.). Copy of docket sheet, motion to proceed IFP, and Prisoner Trust Account form sent to petitioner. Any further documents or correspondence you send to the Clerks Office concerning your case must include the case number. All documents submitted for filing must also contain an original signature. Submitted documents are electronically scanned for filing and they become the official court record. The quality of the official court record is determined by the quality of the original documents received for filing. Writing should only be on one side of the paper and writing must be dark enough for scanning. All documents must be on 8.5 x 11 inch paper. A request to electronically file documents in your case must be made through the PACER Service Center at www.pacer.uscourts.gov. The plaintiff must keep the Court informed if the plaintiff's address changes. If the Court is not kept informed and multiple items are returned as undelivered, the plaintiff's case may be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. (SKK)
July 1, 2021 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28:2254. (SKK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Clark et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: South Dakota Attorney General
Represented By: Chelsea J. Wenzel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Darrian Young
Represented By: Chelsea J. Wenzel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Doug Clark
Represented By: Chelsea J. Wenzel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Charles Ray Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?