Oromo v. Minnehaha County Jail
| Peter Oromo |
| Minnehaha County Jail |
| 4:2021cv04141 |
| August 13, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of South Dakota |
| Karen E Schreier |
| Prisoner Petitions - Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Motion to Extend Deadlines.. Signed by U.S. District Judge Karen E. Schreier on 10/8/2021. (Mailed to Peter Oromo ) (JLS)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Extend Initial Partial Filing Fee Deadline by Peter Oromo. (VMM) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Initial Partial Filing Fee in the amount of 36.43 is due by 10/12/2021. Signed by U.S. District Judge Karen E. Schreier on 9/9/2021.(Mailed to Mr. Oromo and Financial Department at MCJ) (JLS)
|
| Filing 5 PRISONER Trust Account Report. (JLS) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF: The Clerks Office has received your Civil Rights Complaint together with an Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees and Declaration Under Penalty of Perjury. Although a new case has been opened, your application to proceed without prepayment of fees may be denied unless you return the enclosed Prisoner Trust Account Report (to be completed by the institution where you are incarcerated.) Copy of docket sheet and Prisoner Trust Account Report sent to plaintiff. Any further documents or correspondence you send to the Clerks Office concerning your case must include the case number. All documents submitted for filing must also contain an original signature. Submitted documents are electronically scanned for filing and they become the official court record. The quality of the official court record is determined by the quality of the original documents received for filing. Writing should only be on one side of the paper and writing must be dark enough for scanning. All documents must be on 8.5 x 11 inch paper. A request to electronically file documents in your case must be made through the PACER Service Center at www.pacer.uscourts.gov. The plaintiff must keep the Court informed if the plaintiff's address changes. If the Court is not kept informed and multiple items are returned as undelivered, the plaintiff's case may be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. (JLS) |
| Filing 3 FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT of Peter Oromo. (JLS) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Peter Oromo. (JLS) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT pursuant to 42:1983 - Prisoner Civil Rights. (JLS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Oromo v. Minnehaha County Jail | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Peter Oromo | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Minnehaha County Jail | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
