Pollitt et al v. Erickson
| Eric Pollitt and Amy Pollitt |
| Glynis Erickson |
| 4:2021cv04149 |
| August 25, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of South Dakota |
| Karen E Schreier |
| Torts: Personal Injury - Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER Extending Time for Defendant to File Answer re #6 Stipulation filed by Glynis Erickson. Signed by U.S. District Judge Karen E. Schreier on 10/14/21. (TAL)
|
| Filing 6 STIPULATION by Glynis Erickson. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Order Extending Time for Defendant to File Answer to Plaintiffs' Complaint) (Beck, Molly) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Molly K. Beck on behalf of Glynis Erickson. (Beck, Molly) |
| Filing 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SERVICE Executed Admission of Service Acknowledgement filed by Eric Pollitt. (Peterson, Mitchell) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Amended AO 85. (VMM) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Glynis Erickson. One Summons, a Rule 73 Memo, and an AO 85 for each party delivered to plaintiff's counsel via electronic delivery. (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued, #2 AO 85)(VMM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand, $402 fee paid, receipt# No. ASDDC-3616653, in shell case on 08/25/2021 filed by Eric Pollitt, Amy Pollitt on 08/25/2021. (VMM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
