Running Bird v. Mertens-Jones et al
| Harold Running Bird |
| Tammy Mertens-Jones, Douglas Clark, Timothy Reisch and Daniel Sullivan |
| 4:2021cv04197 |
| November 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of South Dakota |
| Karen E Schreier |
| Prisoner Petitions - Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Harold Running Bird. Daniel Sullivan waiver sent on 12/22/2021, answer due 2/22/2022. (Fritz, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 4
First AMENDED COMPLAINT, with Jury Demanded . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Response to 36674, #2 Exhibit B - Response to 36672) (Fritz, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 3
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Harold Running Bird. Tammy Mertens-Jones waiver sent on 12/22/2021, answer due 2/22/2022. (Fritz, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 2
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Harold Running Bird. Douglas Clark waiver sent on 12/22/2021, answer due 2/22/2022. (Fritz, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT pursuant to 42:1983 - Prisoner Civil Rights with Jury Demand ($402 fee paid, receipt# ASDDC-3676423) filed by Harold Running Bird on 11/23/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Response 36674, #2 Exhibit B - Response 36672) (SLT)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
