Pearson v. Royal Canin USA, Inc.
Plaintiff: Brian Pearson
Defendant: Royal Canin USA, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2022cv04018
Filed: February 7, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of South Dakota
Presiding Judge: Karen E Schreier
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER for Discovery Report and Scheduling Information. Signed by U.S. District Judge Karen E. Schreier on 03/30/2022. (KLE)
March 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER to Admit Nonresident Attorneysgranting #7 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Alyssa M. Peterson and #8 Arthur T. Carter for Royal Canin USA, Inc. Signed by U.S. District Judge Karen E. Schreier on 03/30/2022. (KLE)
March 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by Royal Canin USA, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Mars, Incorporated, Other Affiliate Royal Canin USA, Inc. for Royal Canin USA, Inc.. (Evans, Edwin)
March 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 DEFENDANT'S ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Royal Canin USA, Inc.. (Evans, Edwin)
March 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MOTION for Attorney Arthur T. Carter to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $100 PHV fee; receipt number ASDDC-3756066) by Royal Canin USA, Inc.. (Evans, Edwin)
March 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MOTION for Attorney Alyssa M. Peterson to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $100 PHV fee; receipt number BSDDC-3756059) by Royal Canin USA, Inc.. (Evans, Edwin)
March 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Royal Canin USA, Inc. answer due 3/30/2022. Signed by U.S. District Judge Karen E. Schreier on 03/03/2022. (KLE)
March 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Royal Canin USA, Inc.. (Evans, Edwin)
March 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Edwin E. Evans on behalf of Royal Canin USA, Inc.. (Evans, Edwin)
February 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 RETURN OF SERVICE Executed upon Defendant Royal Canin USA, Inc. on 2/15/2022 (Hertz, Elizabeth)
February 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Royal Canin USA, Inc. 1 Summons(es), a Rule 73 Memo, and AO 85s for each party delivered to plaintiff's counsel via electronic delivery. (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued, #2 AO 85)(KLE)
February 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand, $402 fee paid, receipt# ASDDC-3721421, in shell case on 02/07/2022 filed by Brian Pearson on 02/07/2022. (KLE)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pearson v. Royal Canin USA, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brian Pearson
Represented By: Elizabeth S. Hertz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Royal Canin USA, Inc.
Represented By: Edwin E. Evans
Represented By: Alyssa M. Peterson
Represented By: Arthur T. Carter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?