Puepke v. Kijakazi
| Cameron Jay Puepke |
| Kilolo Kijakazi |
| Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration |
| 4:2022cv04106 |
| July 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of South Dakota |
| Veronica L Duffy |
| Social Security: SSID Title XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
Summons Issued as to USA. Summmons(es) delivered to plaintiff's counsel via electronic delivery to plaintiffs attorney. (SKK)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE TO PARTIES: This case is directly assigned to a magistrate judge pursuant to Standing Order 21-10. On or before the date on which the answer must be filed, each party must submit a completed Social Security Case Assignment Form, through which the party either (a) consents to disposition of the case by the magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) or (b) asks to have a district judge assigned to the case.Copy and paste links into browser to refer to the documents below:Standing Order 21-10: www.sdd.uscourts.gov/so2110Social Security Case Assignment form: www.sdd.uscourts.gov/forms/social-security-case-assignment-formCOMPLAINT on Social Security Appeal ($402 fee paid, receipt# ASDDC-3844621) in shell case on 7/29/22 filed by Cameron Jay Puepke on 7/29/22. (SKK)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
