Buergofol GmbH v. Omega Liner Company, Inc.
| Buergofol GmbH |
| Omega Liner Company, Inc. |
| 4:2022cv04112 |
| August 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of South Dakota |
| Karen E Schreier |
| Patent - Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDA) |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Michael Neustel for Omega Liner Company, Inc. Signed by U.S. District Judge Karen E. Schreier on 10/11/22. (SKK)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION for Attorney Michael Neustel to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $100 PHV fee; receipt number ASDDC-3891951) by Omega Liner Company, Inc.. (Stanley, Caren)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE of Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond by Omega Liner Company, Inc. . (Stanley, Caren)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Appearance by Caren L. Stanley on behalf of Omega Liner Company, Inc.. (Stanley, Caren)
|
|
Filing 7
AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons and Complaint served on Kenny Moulds on September 21, 2022, filed by Buergofol GmbH. (Hertz, Elizabeth)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #4 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Darien Wallace; granting #5 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of T. Lester Wallace. Signed by U.S. District Judge Karen E. Schreier on 08/24/2022. (MSB)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION for Attorney T. Lester Wallace to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $100 PHV fee; receipt number ASDDC-3862111) by Buergofol GmbH. (Hertz, Elizabeth)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION for Attorney Darien Wallace to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $100 PHV fee; receipt number ASDDC-3862095) by Buergofol GmbH. (Hertz, Elizabeth)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE/REPORT on Filing of Action Regarding Patent or Trademark emailed US Patent & Trademark Office. (VMM)
|
|
Filing 2
Summons Issued as to Omega Liner Company, Inc.. 1 Summons(es), a Rule 73 Memo, and AO 85s for each party delivered to plaintiff's counsel via electronic delivery. (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued, #2 AO 85)(VMM)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT with Jury Demand, $402 fee paid, receipt# ASDDC-3855373, in shell case on 08/15/2022 filed by Buergofol GmbH on 08/15/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Patent 9657882, #2 Exhibit B - Patent 8794269, #3 Exhibit C - Installation Manual, #4 Exhibit D - Omega Brochure, #5 Exhibit E - Product info) (VMM)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Buergofol GmbH v. Omega Liner Company, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Buergofol GmbH | |
| Represented By: | Elizabeth S. Hertz |
| Represented By: | Darien Wallace |
| Represented By: | T. Lester Wallace |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Omega Liner Company, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Caren L. Stanley |
| Represented By: | Michael Neustel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
