Stading v. Pesall et al
Andrew Stading |
Noel Robert Pesall, William C. Garry, Patrick T. Pardy and State of South Dakota |
4:2023cv04153 |
October 4, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of South Dakota |
Roberto A Lange |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 MEMORANDUM in Support re #8 MOTION to DISMISS for Failure to State a Claim and Lack of Jurisdiction filed by William C. Garry. (Hurd, Andrew) |
Filing 8 MOTION to DISMISS for Failure to State a Claim and Lack of Jurisdiction by William C. Garry. (Hurd, Andrew) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew Sumner Hurd on behalf of William C. Garry. (Hurd, Andrew) |
Filing 6 Summons Returned Unexecuted by Andrew Stading as to Patrick T. Pardy, Noel Robert Pesall, State of South Dakota. (Mr. Stading did not want additional summonses for service and indicated he has a different way to serve the defendants.) (CLR) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Andrew Stading. William C. Garry served on 11/1/2023, answer due 11/22/2023. (CLR) |
Filing 4 SUPPLEMENT by Plaintiff Andrew Stading re #1 Complaint. (Attachments: #1 Part 2 of Supplement) (CLR) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to William C. Garry, Patrick T. Pardy, Noel Robert Pesall, State of South Dakota. 4 Summons(es), AO 85 Forms, and Rule 73 Memo delivered via hand delivery to Pro Se Plaintiff. (CLR) |
Filing 2 NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF: The Clerks Office has received your Complaint together with the filing fee and incorrectly completed summons(es) or no summons(es). A new case has been opened. We are unable to issue summon(es) at this time. Enclosed is a blank summons form and a sample completed summons form. Follow the enclosed instructions to properly complete your summons(es). As soon as the Clerks Office receives your properly completed summons(es), it/they will be issued. Copy of docket sheet, 4 blank summons forms, and sample completed summons form with instructions sent to plaintiff. Pro Se Litigant Registration Form for Electronic Notice also sent to plaintiff. Any further documents or correspondence you send to the Clerks Office concerning your case must include the case number. All documents submitted for filing must also contain an original signature. Pursuant to the E-Government Act and D.S.D. Civ. LR 5.2, you must redact personal identifiers from documents submitted to the Court. The Clerks Office will not review for compliance. Submitted documents are electronically scanned for filing and they become the official court record. The quality of the official court record is determined by the quality of the original documents received for filing. Writing should only be on one side of the paper and writing must be dark enough for scanning. All documents must be on 8.5 x 11 inch paper. A request to electronically file documents in your case must be made through the PACER Service Center at www.pacer.uscourts.gov. The plaintiff must keep the Court informed of the plaintiff's address changes, including changes to primary and secondary email addresses. If the Court is not kept informed and multiple items are returned as undelivered, the plaintiff's case may be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. (CLR) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT , $402 fee paid, receipt# 400002500, filed by Andrew Stading. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents (and a flash drive placed in SF Clerk's Office vault)) (CLR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.